Squadrons of Modern Infantry: What they carry?


US infantry squads are still using World War I concepts and weaponry designed 40 years ago. Except for the awkward 40mm grenade launcher attachment, all firepower is based on direct fire with weak 5.56mm bullets. Furthermore, due to the world’s rapid urbanization, most combat will take place in cities, necessitating stronger weapons, especially if an opponent is wearing modern body armor.

 

Modern Infantry Squad Proposal

A 7.62mm medium machine gun is often used, but it is cumbersome and requires two men to operate. The use of 7.62mm light machine guns, such as a modified M-14, has been proposed, but the recoil on full automatic makes accurate fire difficult. The new MK-48 could be the answer, but this is far from certain. As a result, the SAW may continue to be the best option. The sharpshooter is more than just a sniper; he can fire through body armor, walls, doors, and automobiles. A.50 caliber rifle would be ideal, but semi-automatic models would be too heavy for an infantry squad. a bolt-action weapon. A 50-caliber rifle with five rounds is adequate for an infantry squad but not ideal.

The best sharpshooter weapon is debatable, but the 15-pound semi-automatic Barrett.338 LM (8.6mm) with a 10-round magazine is a good option. (above) Following recent interventions that revealed the need to engage enemy forces nestled among civilians in cities, the US Marine Corps may add a sharpshooter to each squad. If the.338 round enters service, it would be nice to provide an attack team member with something that can fire that round at close targets like doors, cars, and body armor—a bullpup with no scope and no bipod to make it lighter and shorter, but with the penetration power of an 8.6mm round fired through a long barrel.

 

Rockers

The addition of a trained rocketman, dubbed “Rocker,” at the squad level is a significant change. When two forces collide in combat, neither knows what they’ve encountered, and both sides are terrified for the first minute. If one side appears to be stronger, the other side is more likely to flee. During World War I, Erwin Rommel, an expert infantryman, wrote that the first side to set up and fire a machine gun usually won. This is why combat veterans emphasize the importance of maximum firepower on contact over well-aimed rounds.
Despite this, American infantry units rely on machine guns for platoon-level firepower and only keep a few rockets at the company level, despite the fact that most US Army platoons have a weapons squad with two rockets. As a result, when squads and even platoons come into contact, they lack powerful firepower. Firefights frequently devolve into jack-in-the-box shootouts as infantrymen exchange small arms fire for several minutes until supporting fires or heavy firepower can be brought forward. During this critical phase, wounded soldiers suffer, and the enemy has the option of maneuvering, fleeing, or advancing and overrunning the unit.

Anti-Armor Unit

 

The above-mentioned squad is for general-purpose missions. It should also be trained and equipped to act as an anti-armor squad when called upon. Each M-16 soldier would carry an AT-4, while the two heavy shooters with.338s would upgrade to a larger rifle. Barrett created the most popular, the M82A1 Special Applications Scoped Rifle (SASR) (pictured). This semi-automatic weapon weighs 32.5 pounds and has an effective range of 1800 meters with 10.50-caliber rounds. The SASR is lighter than an M240 7.62mm machine gun!

Russian Comedians In A Prank Call With US Special Representative

The US special envoy to Venezuela ignored the potential of US military action in South American countries in the recordings of Russian pranksters revealed on Wednesday.

Elliott Abrams, Special Representative stated in the recording that the United States will not use pressure in Venezuela except if the government makes totally crazy things like attacking the US embassy.

However, Abrams evidently was convinced that he was talking to a Swiss official who said that the United States is trying to overwhelm the Venezuelan army by overthrowing military operations to destruct President Nicolas Maduro.

He said: “We believe that it is wrong to give them countless assurances in tactics that there will be no US military action.” “Although I can certainly tell you that this is absolutely not what we’re currently doing is what you actually see, financial tension, economic burden, and diplomatic force.”

The said prank call was the doing of two Russian comedians namely Vladimir Kuznetsov and Alexei Stojarov. One of them posed as Swiss official who spoke with Abrams with regards to capture of the Venezuelan bank account. Said this is one of the efforts to force Maduro to hand over power to Juan Guaido, the opposition leader.

Note that prank calls can be punishable by law and that for anyone who makes use of prank apps to distract or cause alarm to the government causing chaos and war is a matter that should be taken seriously.

These two Russian comedians are notable for their prank calls with celebrities and public officials. This includes a prank call done with the former British Foreign Ministers last year. The recording of Abrams was published online and was released by the Russian media on Wednesday.

Feedback From The State Department

When asked to provide feedback, the State Department stated in an e-mail: “We are generally very clear that in this instance, they all know the Russian brochure and the length of their support for the Maduro regime.”

It said that the US policy is supporting Venezuela’s democracy and supporting the National Assembly, which could be the only part of the government’s democratic election.”

The United States and over 50 governments acknowledged the leader of the National Assembly, Guaido, as temporary president, suggesting that Maduro had not been lawfully re-elected this past year to head this once productive country.

𐌢