The Soldiers and Their Weapons

Soldiers being part of an army are front liners. They are entitled to have guns and other weapons a situation might force them to use.

Soldiers can be the policemen we often encountered for maintaining peace and order. They can be the armies our government send to wars. They can also be the troopers, snipers, tankers etc. As long as the job is to specifically protect one’s country.

It is very important for the armies to possess great weapons. As mentioned, they are front liners and are expected to protect every people of their country when it comes to war and if the peace and order are compromised. Government has the responsibility of making sure that soldiers have adequate weapons to do their job.

Weapons should not only be guns and bombs. Helmets and body armors should also be taken into account. They protect the country but they should be protected as well. These armors have to give them assurance that during a fight they will not be easily taken down.

Leaders investing on armies and weapons will also be the way for the young ones to be encouraged to join the army. Imagine having a very weak defense. No one will ever be pushed to enter the training and be ready to die for a country. Although, we also have to understand that the main matter most of the time is the budget a country has. It will definitely be expensive. It is like buying a luxurious car, house and lot, and a farm full of trees with a pavilion in it. But the investment is like hiring a professional from locol paint colorado, it will be worth it.

Soldiers and their weapons are somewhat the basis if a country has a good leader and governance. Not all the time but sometimes it reflects on the people who are always serving in front and surrounds the country for protection.

 

Many Artists Sued Donald Trump For Using Their Song

Bruce Springsteen against Ronald Reagan, Bobby McFerrin against George HW Bush, Sting against George W. Bush, and Jackson Browne against John McCain: That musicians in the USA take action against – mostly conservative – politicians because they play their music against their will at election campaign events, is nothing new.

Learn how to download from YouTube to have access to the latest news and developments today. Downloading videos allow you to watch these videos even without being connected to the net.

Neil Young Sued Donald Trump

Since Donald Trump got involved in the election campaign with his pompous rallies in 2015, it has become a popular sport for pop stars to sue the politician. The unprecedented wave of injunctions became the hallmark of Trump’s presidency.

Canadian-American musician Neil Young sued Donald Trump. He accuses him of copyright infringement. His songs “Rockin ‘in the Free World” and “Devil’s Sidewalk” were played at the controversial and little-attended election campaign event on July 5th in Tulsa, Oklahoma.

Young’s lawyers wrote in the complaint that the artist “cannot with a clear conscience allow his music to be used as the ‘theme song’ for a society-divisive, un-American election campaign full of ignorance and hatred”.

The Rolling Stones have a solution

The Rolling Stones fared similarly. When Trump left the stage in Tulsa with the guitar riffs of the Stones classic “You Can’t Always Get What You Want”, the barrel for the Stones overflowed. Despite several injunctions by the band, Trump has repeatedly used the song at election rallies since 2016.

The Rolling Stones have raised objections. The result: Your songs may no longer be used for political purposes. Such use is now a violation of the license agreement – whether this will stand in a court of law is still unclear.

Artists don’t want to be involved with Trump’s populism

According to US attorney Greg Kanaan, who has his firm in Connecticut, this isn’t about copyright or licensing agreements. Instead, it is a problem that affects an artist’s reputation and his brand.

“If the use of a song by a politician gives the buyer of the music the impression that the musician is supporting the politician, and if this connection then damages the musician’s reputation,” the artists could fall back on a law regulating trademark infringement. This is known as “The Lantham Act,” wrote attorney Kanaan in 2015 on his blog.

At that time, Donald Trump’s election campaign, which had just started, was covered by a wave of injunctions for unauthorized use of music – including by the band REM, whose music was played at a Trump rally in Washington DC.

“Don’t use our music or my voice in your mind-boggling monkey drama from election campaigns,” frontman Michael Stipe wrote in an email.

But lawsuits for trademark infringements have almost never been successful in court in the past, explains US attorney Kanaan. It is difficult to gauge what impression the use of a piece of music for political purposes makes on potential buyers.

What Could A Militaristic Approach Do In Managing COVID-19 Crisis?

Five months since COVID-19 became a full-blown pandemic, countries have been scrambling to contain the spread of this deadly pneumonia-like illness that originated from Wuhan, China. Scientists and health experts are rushing against time to find a potent cure for COVID-19, or a vaccine that will give the entire population of the world a lifetime immunity against SARS-CoV-2, the name given to the novel coronavirus that causes this respiratory plague. However, even the experts themselves admit that their knowledge about the nature of this virus is still limited, moreso about a possible cure that could combat COVID-19. Without a cure or a vaccine, it is up to the government to implement necessary rules and regulations to protect the people against the disease.

Countries like the United States of America, Australia, United Kingdom, and Italy, which are known to be progressive nations, are finding it hard to contain the disease as daily reports show an increase in COVID-19 cases for each country. In a desperate bid to fight the pandemic, their governments have figured to use their military force to address the worsening situation due to COVID-19. However, some people doubt that involving the military response might only cause fear and harm, instead of helping everyone get through this pandemic.

Can The Military Really Help In Containing The Spread Of The Coronavirus?

There is no doubt with the amount of training and experience that the military men have received to be able to help their nation in every crisis. Be it in a threat of terrorism or deadly disasters, the military are trained to save the lives of their countrymen and to restore peace and order. However, in a pandemic situation, some people believe that beating COVID-19 is out of the military’s expertise.

Granted, the military force can be used to control the crowd, avoiding the possible spread of the virus in one area. The military can also be effective in the strict observance of lockdown. However, the main issue that needs to be addressed is how to eradicate the virus once and for all. Using the military to make the people stay inside their homes during a quarantine only lowers the chances of the virus’ spread, but the problem still remains. No amount of entertainment, like watching series and movies, can make us forget about the threat of this disease that has already crippled the state of healthcare and economy of the entire world. Although, KissAnime could provide you with an awesome lineup of shows that you can enjoy amid this situation.

Another thing we should look at is the safety of the military themselves. These men are used to physical combats and encounters, but with a microscopic pathogen that could easily enter people’s bodies and make them ill, we might only be making the military as easy target of COVID-19. After all, we should still be mindful of the soldiers’ health and wellness.