The Government Places A Strong Emphasis On Technology

As technology meets traditional craftsmanship in various media, some artists question how and where the line should be drawn for appropriate uses of these new ways of doing old work. If you want to visit the traditional craftmanship here is the link Hugo And Sons.

The government must organize itself in such a way that it is structurally in line with technological developments. Technological developments follow each other at lightning speed. This applies to technologies that fall under the heading of ‘digitization’, but also to things such as DNA modification and quantum technology. Christiaan van den Berg zooms in on the ‘how’: the way in which the government can connect to those developments. “There should be a government-wide (change) program to give shape to the ambition.”

The impact of technology is broad

The impact of technology manifests itself in opportunities for implementation (with drones it is easy to inspect sites) and in threats (drones can also be used for attacks or smuggling). But the impact is broader than that: society is changing under the influence of technology. Also, for example, of the expectations of citizens with regard to communication with the government. Large technology companies are rolling out their services worldwide and are changing the current order (broadcasting system, taxi market, telecom services, banking, et cetera). New technology often brings new possibilities, even if there is no policy or legislation for this yet.

The maturity with which the government handles technology is increasing

Policymakers within the departments are increasingly feeling the need to structurally link up with technological developments. Setting up a special AI team at various ministries is an expression of this. Implementing organizations feel the need to get started quickly with new technologies, which is why we see relatively many innovative experiments there in practice. Ideally, policy development will facilitate these innovations and anticipate the actual implementation of innovative solutions for ‘tomorrow and the day after tomorrow’. In practice, there is a heavy workload on police departments to meet the information needs of society and politics that focus on the problems of ‘today and yesterday.

Political-administrative attention to technology and digitization is growing

Within the government, the attention to technology and digitization is growing. That attention is much more present than three years ago. Think of the Dutch Digitization Strategy, the Dutch Cyber ​​Security Agenda, and the Digital Government Agenda. Increasing attention is also being paid to digitization in Europe and internationally, with an emphasis on AI. The ministries of Economic Affairs and of the Interior and Kingdom Relations have become more active and more often take on an (interdepartmental) leading role, for example in themes such as blockchain and AI. The House of Representatives also recognizes the importance of a good knowledge position with regard to digitization. To this end, it is setting up a permanent Digital Affairs committee.

Towards a structural approach

Various ministries are considering the question of whether and how you can set up a ‘technology functionality’ that ensures that relevant technological developments are acted upon actively and on time. So that policy is made in time to seize opportunities in implementation, or so that legislation is adapted in time to mitigate risks.

A Technology Adaptation Process

The aim of the Technology Adaptation Process is to identify in a timely manner the most relevant technologies about which knowledge is being developed. Based on the insights gained in this way, the government itself can adapt to the new reality. On the other hand, the government can influence the appearance of new technology in society by setting frameworks and making targeted investments. And in this way seize opportunities and mitigate risks.

Towards a government-wide (change) program

The ambition to structurally link up with technological developments and to act actively and in a timely manner on the relevant technological developments requires changes in many areas. Adjustments are needed in the field of HR (including training, strategic personnel policy), policy development, and in various communities around important technologies such as quantum technology, Virtual Reality, and Privacy Enhancing Technologies. We need practical tools and approaches, and simply more capacity. We also need new structures for governance, so that we can give sufficient policy attention to technologies that have not yet been assigned as a priority to a specific department. There should be a government-wide (change) program to give shape to the ambition.

Government: focus on technology

Technologies follow each other at lightning speed. In order to maintain legitimacy and trust and to ensure that the government continues to fulfill its social tasks now and in the future, it is important for the government to continue to structurally connect: continue to learn, research, and become wiser together. Based on these insights, the government itself can adapt to the new reality. On the other hand, the government can influence the appearance of new technology in society by setting frameworks and making targeted investments.

Infantry and their Tactics

The infantry solves tasks at distances close to the enemy. This can be the range of a grenade throw, the distance to the next bend in the trench or to the nearest building, or the maximum effective range of small arms fire when operating on treeless flat terrain, and so on. This implies the main condition for the infantry to carry out its tasks – the need for rapprochement with the enemy for a short distance for a given situation.

The fire of modern weapons, if nothing interferes with it, is capable of completely destroying the enemy’s infantry located in its zone of action. Neither the speed of convergence, nor the number of attacking soldiers are of no importance under these conditions. One machine gun, under certain conditions, is capable of stopping the advance of an infantry battalion.

Movement in the zone of enemy fire is possible only if this fire is made ineffective or if it is completely stopped.

The main principle of the infantry’s actions is that it is possible to move across the battlefield (approach, withdrawal, etc.) only by significantly complicating the enemy’s firing, making it ineffective or eliminating it completely.

At every moment of the battle, the infantryman must look for an answer to the question of what needs to be done to make it difficult for the enemy to conduct effective fire. When planning actions for each moment of time, a procedure for preventing enemy fire must be developed. Need a review on which phone is good? try – nokia 9 hinta

Obstruction of enemy observation by covering behind an opaque obstacle, by setting up smoke, camouflage, etc.

the enemy does not see or does not see well where he is shooting, it is difficult for him to aim and adjust the fire, which means that the probability of his miss increases. As a very exotic way, one can mention the approach to the enemy along the bottom of a reservoir (river) with a bag of stones over his shoulder, a weapon hermetically packed in polyethylene and a breathing tube on the surface.

The main thing in the actions of the infantry is the method of suppression by fire.

Its essence is that the enemy is fired so that the enemy is forced to hide behind a cover and not protrude from behind him for aiming, or his aiming should be prevented by explosions or bullets around him.

The infantry must be ready for the fact that it will have to act without the support of other types of troops.

That is, be ready not only for combined arms, but also for anti-personnel, anti-tank, anti-aircraft combat. As practice shows, the ability of the command to leave the infantry without real support from other branches of the armed forces is limitless: artillery preparation and aerial bombardment are carried out for show, without real targets, across areas; tanks and artillery are not placed on direct fire in order to avoid damage to the sights; during the battle, tanks fight against tanks, artillery against artillery, etc. The infantry must be prepared to act independently.