Reasons Why Government Should Ban Smoking in Public Places

As more places think of banning smoking in public areas, Kentucky, as one of the more difficult tobacco-using states, will surely proceed to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this matter with significant fervor. As someone in the health and fitness industry, I feel the obligation to weigh this concern.  There are plenty of reasons why smoking must be banned. Here are some:

No. 1: Secondhand smoke has severe adverse health impacts even if its a Let’s RELX vape. I especially don’t mind what you do to your own body, although the educator in me would suggest you to resign for your own good. I do care that your behavior influences the health of others.

No. 2: Litter decrease. Cigarette butts equates for thousands of pieces of litter annually and detracts from a location’s aesthetic. If smokers would get rid of their waste correctly when they’re in public areas, this might may not be a big deal, but unfortunately, they don’t. The proof is there, dirtying clean buildings and the neighboring landscape with cigarette trash. A smoking ban would lessen litter. Although not a main argument in assistance of a public smoking ban, it is still a reliable one.

No. 3: The lingering smell of stale cigarettes. In bars and restaurants and other institutions that permit smoking, several patrons find the scent of cigarettes to be uncomfortable and irritating. Cigarette smoke does stick on people’s clothes and hair and takes longer to disappear even after the person smoking has left. Clothes used to a smoky bar may still smell like smoke after a few days.

No. 4: The power to a good workplace. It is the burden of the employer to give a safe and healthy atmosphere for its workers. While a to of workers prefer to work in workplaces that allow smoking, others may choose not to be around smoke but continue to do so since they need the work. A smoking ban opponent may just say, “work somewhere without smoke,” yet I would say that your determination to smoke in public is not as essential as that employee’s health and livelihood.